Corporate & Internal Investigations

Companies often must decide whether to conduct internal investigations after receiving information that could indicate ongoing violations of trade laws and regulations. Torres Trade Law discretely assists companies and boards of directors conducting internal audits and investigations. We take adequate steps to preserve the attorney-client privilege, immediately stop ongoing violations, and ensure resources and personnel are assigned to the investigative team.

We also guide companies who have discovered violations – including of export rules, economic sanctions, anti-corruption and money-laundering regulations, and customs laws – through the Voluntary Self-Disclosure process. And we work with clients to develop and implement airtight internal compliance programs to minimize the risk of recurring costly violations.

Our services include assistance on:

  • Government investigations (exports, economic sanctions, customs issues)
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
  • Whistleblower Allegations
  • Computer Forensics
  • E-discovery Services
  • Expert Testimony
  • Forensic Investigations
  • Litigation Intelligence
  • Managed Document Review
  • Trial Support Services
  • Voluntary Disclosures to Government agencies

Frequently Asked Questions: Corporate and Internal Investigations

1. What triggers the need for a corporate or internal investigation?

Common triggers include allegations of trade law violations, whistleblower complaints, suspected customs fraud or tariff evasion, violations of export controls or sanctions, internal audits revealing irregularities, and regulatory investigations or requests for information (see, BIS, DDTC, OFAC, and CBP Subpoenas and Requests for Information – Tips to Comply).

2. What laws or regulations are commonly involved in international trade-related investigations?

Typical legal frameworks include U.S. export controls (International Traffic in Arms Regulations/Export Administration Regulations), economic sanctions (Office of Foreign Assets Control), the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), anti-money laundering regulations, customs laws, and anti-boycott rules.

3. Who should conduct an internal investigation—inside counsel or outside law firm?

An outside law firm is recommended for serious or material allegations and those potentially reportable to regulators (e.g., CBP, DDTC, BIS), or when independence is critical. In-house counsel may handle less critical or routine issues.

4. How do we protect attorney-client privilege during an investigation?

To preserve privilege:

  • Involve legal counsel early.
  • Mark investigation-related documents as privileged and confidential.
  • Limit distribution to only those who need access.
  • Document legal purpose for activities.

5. What are the main stages of an internal investigation?

  • Scoping and planning
  • Document collection and review
  • Conducting witness interviews
  • Analysis of findings
  • Recommendations and remediation
  • Reporting findings to management, board, or regulators as needed.

For additional information, see Conducting Effective Corporate Investigations.

6. What are the risks of not conducting an internal investigation?

Potential risks include increased regulatory penalties, loss of mitigating factors in enforcement, civil liability, reputational harm, and business disruptions.

8. When and how should the company self-disclose findings to regulators?

Voluntary self-disclosure is advisable when violations are material and proactive cooperation could mitigate penalties. Timing and content should be coordinated with external legal counsel. See our VSD Handbook for additional information about voluntary self-disclosures to relevant regulators and enforcement agencies.

9. What are best practices for conducting witness interviews?

  • Prepare in advance with clear objectives.
  • Clarify representation and confidentiality to interviewees (Upjohn warning).
  • Take thorough notes or memos.
  • Memorialize interviews shortly afterward.

10. How should a company handle whistleblower complaints?

Investigate impartially and promptly, ensure confidentiality to the extent possible, and protect against retaliation in accordance with whistleblower protection rules.

11. What remedial actions may result from an investigation?

Actions can include internal discipline, compliance program improvements, training, reporting to authorities, operational changes, or restitution.

For more nuanced or situation-specific inquiries, consulting with specialized outside counsel is recommended. If you believe an internal investigation related to international trade or national security is required or would be beneficial for your company, please do not hesitate to reach out to Torres Trade Law.

INSIGHTS

DOJ Memoranda Impact FCPA, FARA, and Other National Security Enforcement Priorities

By: Derrick Kyle, Senior Associate, and Camille Edwards, Associate
Date: 02/11/2025

 

President Trump’s pick for Attorney General, Pam Bondi, took quick action upon her swearing in on February 5, 2025, to make changes within the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) via the issuance of fourteen separate memorandum directives to DOJ employees. The memoranda kick-off Bondi’s efforts to re-calibrate DOJ policies, enforcement priorities, and internal procedures to align with broader policies of the Trump administration. Two of the memoranda in particular, one laying out a “General Policy Regarding Charging, Plea Negotiations, and Sentencing” (“General Policy Memorandum”) and the other focused on the “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations” (“Cartel Policy Memorandum”), include several key changes related to the DOJ’s enforcement of corporate crime, corruption, and national security-related laws.

 

U.S. Government to Foreign Persons: Comply with Economic Sanctions and Export Control Laws

By: Olga Torres and Derrick Kyle
Date: 03/07/2024

In a move that highlights the U.S. government’s ongoing fight against evasion of sanctions and export control laws, the Departments of the Treasury, Commerce, and Justice yesterday published yet another Tri-Seal Compliance Note directed specifically at foreign persons, describing the applicability of these international trade and finance laws to foreign-based persons (the “March 6 Compliance Note”). Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the significant increase of sanctions and export controls targeting Russia, these Departments have published Tri-Seal Compliance Notes on “Third-Party Intermediaries Used to Evade Russia-Related Sanctions” and “Export Controls and Voluntary Self-Disclosure of Potential Violations.”

Trade Due Diligence in the Context of an IPO

By: Olga Torres and Camille Edwards
Date: 01/30/2024

Ensuring compliance with U.S. export controls, import regulations, and economic sanctions is common practice for companies that engage in international trade. These companies often have internal compliance policies and due diligence practices that help to monitor compliance for everyday operations. In addition, companies undergoing structural, or ownership changes often must conduct trade-related due diligence to assess compliance risks associated with a relevant target company. 

Syrian Aid Charity Sentenced for Export Violations

By: Derrick Kyle, Senior Associate
Date: 01/30/2024

On December 28, 2023, a federal court sentenced New Hampshire charity NuDay (a/k/a NuDay Syria) to five years of probation – the maximum sentence for an organizational defendant – for three counts of Failure to File Export Information.

5 Key Takeaways from BIS’s Newest Voluntary Self-Disclosure Memorandum

By: Olga Torres, Managing Member
Date: 01/30/2024

In its third memorandum in the past two years,1 BIS recently announced further updates to its Voluntary Self-Disclosure (VSD) process related to administrative violations. My last article covered BIS’s April 18, 2023 memorandum, which discussed incentives for companies to disclose violations after uncovering “significant violations” or risk higher penalties because a failure to disclose will be treated as an aggravating factor.

Trade Alert: State Department Publishes Third Consent Agreement of the Year

Date: 09/02/2023

The State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (“DDTC”) published its third consent agreement of the year on August 28, 2023. This consent agreement is part of an administrative settlement with Island Pyrochemical Industries Corporation (“IPI”)1 involving three alleged violations of the Arms Export Control Act (“AECA”) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”). Specifically, IPI engaged in unauthorized brokering activities related to the transfer of ammonium perchlorate (“APC”)2 from an entity from China, a proscribed country under §126.1 of the ITAR, to a Brazilian company. In addition, IPI misrepresented the roles of the Chinese and Brazilian entities and falsely stated that it was the manufacturer of APC on DSP-5 license applications.